Season

Kharif

Sesame

FP: Use of local variety

TO1: GT 10: Early maturing(75 days),bold seeded, average yield 10q/ha, Potential yield 15 q/ha, oil content 50% suitable for kharif condition under rainfed condition and in summer under irrigated condition.

TO2: Amrit : Medium maturity (80 days), seed coat is bright white, bold seeds, average yield 10.0 q/ha, potential yield 16.0 q/ha, recommended for kharif under rainfed condition and summer under irrigated condition.

FP-3.8

TO₁-5.2

TO₂-4.9

FP-17600

TO₁-37000

TO₂-34600

7

Kharif

Paddy

FP- Use variety Swarna

TO_1- Pratikshya variety(145 days) having yield potential of 45q/ha

TO2– Hasanta variety (145days) tolerant to BPH having yield potential of 39 q/ha

FP-34.6

TO₁-42.6

TO₂-48.5

FP-26200

TO₁-31700

TO₂-39875

5

Rabi

Greengram

TO₁–Date of sowing: 2^nd fortnight of January

TO₂– Date of sowing: 1^st fortnight of February

FP-3.6

TO₁-4.8

TO₂-4.6

FP-11600

TO₁-19500

TO₂-18000

Kharif

Tomato

FP – Use of local variety

TO₁ –  HYV disease resistance to wilting. Fruits round  shape, large (70-85g), Deep red . Suitable for fresh market.

TO₂ – High  yielding F1 hybrid with triple disease resistance to ToL CV, BW and early blight . Fruits square round , large (90-100g), Deep red , firm fruits. Suitable for fresh market and processing. Yield 60-70 t/ha

FP-245

TO₁-320

TO₂-316

FP-155000

TO₁-205000

TO₂-201000

Assessment of management of sucking pest (aphids) in cowpea

FP – Injudicious use of insecticides like  Dimethoate 30EC @ 2ml/lit

TO1 – Foliar spraying  with Imidachloprid 17.8 SL @ 0.5ml/lit

TO₂ – Foliar spraying  with Flonicamid 50%WG @ 0.4g/lit along with yellow sticky trap @ 50 nos./ha

FP-32.8

TO₁-39.6

TO₂-42.5

FP-29100

TO₁-40700

TO₂-44500

7

FP – Pooja

TO₁ – Pratikshya

TO₂ – Hasanta

31.6

41.2

45.3

17900

29500

35000

FP – Local

TO₁ – GT-10

TO₂ – Amrit

3.8

5.6

4.8

21250

36500

31750

FP – Laxmi

TO₁ – Arka Rakshak

TO₂ – Arka Samrat

265

460

440

168000

345000

328000

FP – Only use of NPK, no use of Secondary Nutrients & Micro nutrients

TO₁ – Soil application of Gypsum, Foliar application of Calcium 5% (1-2 Tbsp/gallon) of water

TO₂ – Use of Arka Vegetable Micronutrient Formulation as spray after flowering  @ 10-20 g/litre

265

385

420

25110

33480

32085

Rabi

2019-20

FP- 2^nd  fortnight of Feb)

TO₁– 2^nd  fortnight of January

TO₂– 1^st fortnight of February

3.6

4.8

4.6

25110

33480

32085

Rabi

2019-20

FP – Fire in every evening hour in orchard which fails to control the population of the moths

TO₁ –  Foliar application of neem oil(1%) at 10 days interval at coinciding with colour breaking stage)

TO₂ – Poison bait destroying larval host plant during off season

228

248

260

271000

301000

320000

FP – Low yield in the traditional marigold cultivation during Rabi season

TO₁–Ceracole

80

84

93655

100557

Season

Crop

Title

Details of technology

Result (q/ha)

Net income (Rs.)

No. of farmers

Summer

Moong

Assessment of sowing time of summer moong bean

 TO1 : 2nd fortnight of January

TO2 : 1^st fortnight of February

TO₁ : 3.21

TO₂ : 4.25

TO₃ : 5.2

TO₁ : 5500

TO₂ : 7500

TO₃ : 9500

07

Rabi

Tomato

Assessment of nutrient management for Blossom end rot in tomato

To1 – Soil application of Gypsum, Foliar application of Calcium 5% (1-2 Tbsp/gallon) of water

To2 – Use of Arka Vegetable Micronutrient Formulation as spray after flowering  @ 10-20 g/litre

TO₁ : 265

TO₂ : 385

TO₃ : 420

TO₁ : 168000

TO₂ : 273000

TO₃ : 305000

07

Rabi

Sweet orange

Assessment of IPM module for management of fruit sucking moth in sweet orange

To1 – Neem oil  forms a coating on the insect’s body, blocking the breathing openings and suffocating the insect.

To2 – Poison bait attracts and kills the insect whereas by destroying larval host plant reduces the insect population during off season

TO₁ : 228

TO₂ : 248

TO₃ : 260

TO₁ : 271000

TO₂ : 301000

TO₃ : 320000

07

Kharif

Rice

Assessment of long duration High yielding rice variety in kharif

TO₁: Mrunalini : Small bold grains, Semi dwarf, Maturity-146days, Moderately resistant to blast, sheath blight, sheath rot, Resistance to gall midge, yellow stem borer, leaf folder, resistance to lodging

TO₂: Pradhan dhan (CR Dhan 409) shallow lowlands of Odisha state,Maturity-160 days. Semi dwarf, non-lodging plant type, height -120-130cm, long slender grain, 350-400 panicles per m², high tillering (12-15) , test weight of 22.5g, moderate submergence tolerance, moderately resistant to leaf blast, neck blast, sheath blight, sheath rot, yellow stem borer

TO₁ : 36.7

TO₂ : 44.5

TO₃ : 44.2

TO₁ : 18950

TO₂ : 30300

TO₃ : 28940

07

Kharif

Tomato

Assessment of different types of trellis in tomato

TO1 :Staking with bamboo to individual plants

TO2 :Trellis should be of approximately 6 feet high with a top & bottom wire and plastic twine tied between the two wires at each plant. Posts should be no more than 15 feet apart and the top wire should be very tight. A stiff  additional wire between posts may be required in the season when the fruit loads becomes heavy

TO₁ : 240

TO₂ : 324

TO₃ : 335

TO₁ : 215000

TO₂ : 330000

TO₃ : 356500

07

Technology option

No. of trials

Yield component

Disease/ insect pest incidence (%)

Yield

(q/ha)

Cost of cultivation

(Rs./ha)

Gross return (Rs/ha)

Net return

(Rs./ha)

BC ratio

No. of effective tillers/hill

No. of spikelet per panicle

Test wt. (100 grain wt.)

Assessment of sowing time of summer moong bean

7

8.8

9.6

11.5

7.4

8.8

10.5

35.8

36.2

36.5

15%

FP-3.21

TO1-4.25

TO2 -5.2

12000

12500

12500

17500

20000

22000

5500

7500

9500

1.46

1.60

1.76

Assessment of nutrient management for Blossom end rot in tomato

7

FP-265

TO1-385

TO2 -420

97000

112000

115000

265000

385000

420000

168000

273000

305000

2.73

3.43

3.65

Assessment of IPM module for management of fruit sucking moth in sweet orange

7

24%

17%

12%

FP-228

TO1-248

TO2 -260

185000

195000

200000

456000

496000

520000

271000

301000

320000

2.46

2.54

2.60

Assessment of long duration High yielding rice variety in kharif

7

FP-36.7

TO1-44.5

TO2 – 44.2

28000

28000

28650

46950

58300

57600

18950

30300

28940

1.67

2.08

2.01

Assessment of different types of trellis in tomato

7

FP-240

TO1-324

TO2 – 335

145000

150000

146000

360000

480000

502500

215000

330000

356500

2.48

3.20

3.40

1.

Title of On Farm Trial

Assessment of integrated weed management in kharif tomato

2.

Problem diagnosed

Lower yield due to high weed infestation and high cost of manual  weeding

3.

Details of technologies selected for assessment/refinement

(Mention either Assessed or Refined)

TO₁ Quizalofop-p-ethyl (Targa super)

TO₂ Mulching with Polythene sheet(30 micron)

4.

Source of Technology (ICAR/ AICRP/SAU/other, please specify)

Source: ICAR News 2016, ICAR-Directorate of Weed Research

5.

Production system and thematic area

Integrated weed  management.

6.

Performance of the Technology with performance indicators

Weed intensity, % weed infestation, Cost of intervention. Additional income over additional investment Yield (q/ha), B:C ratio

7.

Final recommendation for micro level situation

Mulching with Polythene sheet(30 micron)

8.

Constraints identified and feedback for research

Availability of mulching material in local market

9.

Process of farmers participation and their reaction

Farmers satisfied with this technology but initial investment is little bit costly

Technology option

No. of trials

Yield (q/ha)

Cost of cultivation(Rs./ha)

Gross return (Rs/ha)

Net return (Rs./ha)

BC ratio

FP

7

256.4

140941

380541

239600

2.7

TO1

7

278.6

148833

416733

267900

2.8

TO2

7

328.2

144291

490591

346300

3.4

1.

Title of On Farm Trial

Assessment of IDM module for management of Erwinia rot in banana

2.

Problem diagnosed

Low yield due high mortality in plant population by Erwinia rot

3.

Details of technologies selected for assessment/refinement

(Mention either Assessed or Refined)

FP: Use of Mancozeb @ 2g/lit after  severe infection

TO₁ Application of bleaching powder 2% @ 25 g/plant/month two inches away from pseudostem around the collar region upto four months

TO₂ Drenching and foliar spray of copper oxychloride 50WP at 3 g/l + streptomycin sulphate 0.5 g/l at 15 days interval beginning from 15 days after planting

4.

Source of Technology (ICAR/ AICRP/SAU/other, please specify)

ICAR-NRCB, 2011

5.

Production system and thematic area

Integrated disease management

6.

Performance of the Technology with performance indicators

TO₁– Application of bleaching powder at pseudostem around the collar region upto four months was found most effective

TO₂-Drenching and foliar spray of combination of fungicide and bactericide at 15 days interval beginning from 15 days after planting suppress the bacterial growth

7.

Final recommendation for micro level situation

Timely application pesticides and other cultural practices

8.

Constraints identified and feedback for research

Infection occurs after 45 days of planting and continue upto fruiting stage. Hence, it is difficult to control without studying the disease cycle and predisposing factors.

9.

Process of farmers participation and their reaction

Farmers able to check the rotting  of the plant and they need some new technologies to control other diseases in banana.

Technology option

No. of trials

Yield component

Disease/ insect pest incidence (%)

Yield (q/ha)

Cost of cultivation (Rs./ha)

Gross return (Rs/ha)

Net return (Rs./ha)

BC ratio

No. of effective tillers/hill

No. of spikelet per panicle

Test wt. (100 grain wt.)

FP

7

TO1

7

Continuing

TO2

7

1.

Title of On Farm Trial

Assessment of IPM module for management of fruit sucking moth in sweet orange

2.

Problem diagnosed

Fruit sucking moth causes fruit drop at colour breaking stage

3.

Details of technologies selected for assessment/refinement

(Mention either Assessed or Refined)

FP- Fire in every evening hour in orchard which fails to control the population of the moths

TO1- Removal of alternate host, installation of light trap, poison bait, foliar application of neem oil(1%) at 10 days interval at coinciding with colour breaking stage.

TO2- Hanging of polypropylene sachets with acephate 75% SP 10g @ 2nos./tree at coinciding with colour breaking stage

4.

Source of Technology (ICAR/ AICRP/SAU/other, please specify)

TO1- Annual Report, ICAR-NRCC,  2016

TO2- ICAR-CCRI, 2018

5.

Production system and thematic area

Integrated Pest Management

6.

Performance of the Technology with performance indicators

TO1-Removal of alternate host arrest pest population, light trap & poison bait attract the moth, fumigation & spraying repel the moth colour breaking stage of fruits

TO2–Hanging polypropylene sachets with Acephate 75% SP act as a repellent of moth to the orchard.

7.

Final recommendation for micro level situation

Timely installation of poison bait, light traps and other cultural practices

8.

Constraints identified and feedback for research

Infestation occurs during colour breaking stage of fruits, nocturnal in nature and having several alternate hosts. Hence, it is difficult to control without studying the insect biolgy.

9.

Process of farmers participation and their reaction

Farmers are not able to manage the moth with technology as the moth attracted towards light rather bait

Technology option

No. of trials

Yield component

Disease/ insect pest incidence (%)

Yield(q/ha)

Cost of cultivation (Rs./ha)

Gross return (Rs/ha)

Net return (Rs./ha)

BC ratio

No. of effective tillers/hill

No. of spikelet per panicle

Test wt. (100 grain wt.)

FP

7

–

–

–

18

122

165000

366000

201000

2.22

TO1

7

–

–

–

8

156

185000

468000

283000

2.53

TO2

7

–

–

–

11

145

190000

435000

245000

2.29

1.

Title of On Farm Trial

Assessment of    different value added products from tomato

2.

Problem diagnosed

Distress sale, spoilage due to high perishability without any value addition

3.

Details of technologies selected for assessment/refinement

(Mention either Assessed or Refined)

TO₁: Preparation of Tomato Puree.

TO₂: Preparation of Tomato Sauce /ketch up

4.

Source of Technology (ICAR/ AICRP/SAU/other, please specify)

Source: PHT Centre,TNAU,2015

5.

Production system and thematic area

Homestead Value addition

6.

Performance of the Technology with performance indicators

Sensory evaluation, Market acceptability

7.

Final recommendation for micro level situation

Value addition with proper packaging will be a very good income in lacal market

8.

Constraints identified and feedback for research

Availability of Packaging material

9.

Process of farmers participation and their reaction

Value addition in tamato increases profit margin and goodmarket demand

Technology option

No. of trials

Yield component

Yeild (kg/q)

Cost of cultivation (Rs./ha)

Gross return (Rs/ha)

Net return (Rs./ha)

BC ratio

Selling price/q

FP

7

1000

100

185000

344000

300

1.6

TO1

7

7800

25

195000

385000

4900

3.00

TO2

7

9860

28

200000

406000

5350

3.40

1.

Title of On Farm Trial

Assessment of  different shapes   for cultivation of Paddy straw mushroom (Volvariella volvacea) using crumpled straw.

2.

Problem diagnosed

Less production in paddy straw mushroom using crumpled straw due to  inappropriate shape

3.

Details of technologies selected for assessment/refinement

(Mention either Assessed or Refined)

TO1: Square compact bed size (30 × 30 cm)

TO2: Circular compact bed size -(45 cm diameter, 30 cm height)

4.

Source of Technology (ICAR/ AICRP/SAU/other, please specify)

Department of Plant Pathology, Tamil            Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore- 2012

5.

Production system and thematic area

Homestead/Backyard Income generation

6.

Performance of the Technology with performance indicators

Average weight/button (g), Pin head appearance (days) Biological efficiency (%),

7.

Final recommendation for micro level situation

Maximum yield was observed in Square compact bed size (30 × 30 cm)

8.

Constraints identified and feedback for research

Care is needed for watering and management of mushroom bed.

9.

Process of farmers participation and their reaction

Farm women were much acquainted with the practice and waste straw can be utlised income generation.

Technology option

No. of trials

Yield component

Yield (kg/bed)

Cost of cultivation (Rs./100beds)

Gross return (Rs/100beds)

Net return (Rs./ha)

BC ratio

Biological efficiency

FP

7

11.4

0.650

5200

13000

7800

1.90

TO1

7

9.5

0.445

5000

8800

3800

1.45

TO2

7

14.8

0.748

5560

14860

9200

2.84

1.

Title of On farm Trial

Assessment of high yielding medium duration rice varieties in kharif

2.

Problem diagnosed

Low yield in medium land due cultivation of old varieties

3.

Details of technologies selected for assessment/refinement

(Mention either Assessed or Refined)

FP (Lalata)

TO₁(Kalinga Dhan 1201)

TO_{2 –} (Kalinga Dhan 1204)

4.

Source of Technology (ICAR/ AICRP/SAU/other, please specify)

Rice Research Station, Dept. Of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Bhubaneswar, 2021

5.

Production system and thematic area

Varietal evaluation, Kharif, Rainfed, medium land

6.

Performance of the Technology with performance indicators

No. of EBT/m2, No of filled grains/panicle, Test weight (gm), Yield (q/ha)        Profit(Rs), B:C

7.

Final recommendation for micro level situation

Kalinga Dhan 1204 Performed better than Kalinga Dhan 1201 and Practised variety (Lalat) with higher number of EBT and more profit

8.

Constraints identified and feedback for research

—

9.

Process of farmers participation and their reaction

Farmers cultivated the new rice varieties and satisfied with their performance

Technology option

No. of trials

Yield component

Yield

(q/ha)

Cost of cultivation

(Rs./ha)

Gross return (Rs/ha)

Net return

(Rs./ha)

BC ratio

No. of effective tillers/hill

No. of spikelet per panicle

Test wt. (100 grain wt.)

FP (Lalata)

7

245

97

20.1

34.5

42500

68500

26000

1.58

TO₁(Kalinga Dhan 1201)

7

284

106

19.8

41.7

45900

85900

40000

1.89

TO_{2 –} (Kalinga Dhan 1204)

7

287

113

19.8

42.8

45900

88900

43000

1.96

1.

Title of On farm Trial

Assessment of High yielding finger millet Varieties in Kharif

2.

Problem diagnosed

Scope for improvement in yield of finger millet and crop diversification

3.

Details of technologies selected for assessment/refinement

(Mention either Assessed or Refined)

FP:Cultivation of local var. kala mandia

TO1: Arjun

TO2: Kalua

TO3: OUAT Kalinga finger millet-601 (Shreeratna)

4.

Source of Technology (ICAR/ AICRP/SAU/other, please specify)

CPR, Behampur, OUAT-2021

5.

Production system and thematic area

Kharif, Rainfed, up land and medium land

6.

Performance of the Technology with performance indicators

Plant height (cm), No. of effective tillers/hill, No of fingers/ ear, Test weight (g), Yield (q/ha), Profit (Rs),     B:C

7.

Final recommendation for micro level situation

All the three introduced varieties have higher yield than local variety out of which Shreeratna performed the best

8.

Constraints identified and feedback for research

—

9.

Process of farmers participation and their reaction

Farmers cultivated the new rice varieties and satisfied with their performance

Technology option

No. of trials

Yield component

Yield

(q/ha)

Cost of cultivation

(Rs./ha)

Gross return (Rs/ha)

Net return

(Rs./ha)

BC ratio

No. of effective tillers/hill

No. of spikelet per panicle

Test wt. (100 grain wt.)

FP

Cultivation of local var. kala mandia

3.1

4.3

3.03

7.9

19500

28383

8883

1.41

T O₁

Arjun

4.8

6.8

3.19

14.2

31500

58313

26813

1.88

T O ₂

Kalua

4.2

6.1

3.06

12.9

31500

53313

21813

1.75

TO₃

Shreeratna

5.7

7.4

3.18

15.3

31500

61744

30244

1.94

1.

Title of On farm Trial

Assessment of IDM module for management of Sigatoka leaf spot disease in Banana

2.

Problem diagnosed

Sigatoka leaf spot disease reduce yield and quality of fruit size in Banana

3.

Details of technologies selected for assessment/refinement

(Mention either Assessed or Refined)

TO1: Cutting & destroying infected leaves, spraying of (Carbendazim 12%+ Mancozeb 63% WP) @ 1kg/ha, Propiconazole 25%EC @ 500ml/ha and (Tebuconazole+Trifloxystrobin75WG) @ 200g/ha at 25days interval starting from initiation of the disease (generally at 150DAP)

* 1% Petroleum based mineral oil should be added to each chemical at the time of spraying

TO2:Cutting & destroying infected leaves, spraying of mineral oil @ 1% with Carbendazim @ 0.2% or Calixin @ 0.15% twice at 25 days interval starting from initiation of the disease

4.

Source of Technology (ICAR/ AICRP/SAU/other, please specify)

AICRP on Fruits,OUAT, 2020-21

NRCB, 2019

5.

Production system and thematic area

Irrigated medium land, IDM

6.

Performance of the Technology with performance indicators

Percentage of disease infestation

FP-28

TO1-4.3

TO2-9.1

7.

Final recommendation for micro level situation

Cutting & destroying infected leaves, spraying of (Carbendazim 12%+ Mancozeb 63% WP) @ 1kg/ha, Propiconazole 25%EC @ 500ml/ha and (Tebuconazole+Trifloxystrobin 75WG) @ 200g/ha at25days interval starting from initiation of the disease (generally at 150DAP)

8.

Constraints identified and feedback for research

Sigatoka disease resistant variety are more preferable instead of repeated spraying

9.

Process of farmers participation and their reaction

Group meeting, Personal contact, Diagnostic visit, Method demonstration

Technology option

No. of trials

Yield component

Disease/ insect pest incidence (%)

Yield

(q/ha)

Cost of cultivation

(Rs./ha)

Gross return (Rs/ha)

Net return

(Rs./ha)

BC ratio

No. of effective tillers/hill

No. of spikelet per panicle

Test wt. (100 grain wt.)

FP

11

28.0

332

205523

431600

226077

2.1

TO1

11

4.3

468

234000

608400

374000

2.6

TO2

11

9.1

417

225875

542100

316225

2.4

1.

Title of On farm Trial

Assessment of IPM module for management of Panicle mites in Rice

2.

Problem diagnosed

Panicle initiation reduce yield & market value

3.

Details of technologies selected for assessment/refinement

(Mention either Assessed or Refined)

TO1: Seed Treatment with Imidacloprid 70%WS @ 7g/kg of seed and two spraying of Acetamiprid 20% SP @ 0.3g/L at 7 days interval during PI stage

TO2: Two spraying of Diafenthiuron 50% SC @ 2g/lit at 7 days interval during PI stage

4.

Source of Technology (ICAR/ AICRP/SAU/other, please specify)

Annual report, DRR-2015

Indian Journal of Science Research and Technology ,2014

5.

Production system and thematic area

Irrigated medium land, IPM

6.

Performance of the Technology with performance indicators

Disease/ insect pest incidence (%)

FP- 21

TO1-8

TO2-6

7.

Final recommendation for micro level situation

Two spraying of Diafenthiuron 50% SC @ 2g/lit at 7 days interval during PI stage

8.

Constraints identified and feedback for research

Panicle mite resistant rice variety

9.

Process of farmers participation and their reaction

Group meeting, Personal contact, Diagnostic visit, Method demonstration

Technology option

No. of trials

Yield component

Disease/ insect pest incidence (%)

Yield

(q/ha)

Cost of cultivation

(Rs./ha)

Gross return (Rs/ha)

Net return

(Rs./ha)

BC ratio

No. of effective tillers/hill

No. of spikelet per panicle

Test wt. (100 grain wt.)

FP

11

21.0

37.3

40712

81425

40713

2.0

TO1

11

8.0

43.8

41570

95615

54044

2.3

TO2

11

6.0

46.7

43380

101946

58566

2.35

1.

Title of On farm Trial

Assessment of IPM module for management of Fruit sucking moth in Sweet Orange

2.

Problem diagnosed

Fruit sucking moth causes drop at colour braking stage

3.

Details of technologies selected for assessment/refinement

(Mention either Assessed or Refined)

TO1: Removal of alternate host, installation of light trap, poison bait, foliar application of neem oil (1%) at 10 days interval at coinciding with colour breaking stage

TO2: Hanging of polypropylene sachets with acephate 75% SP 10g @ 2nos./ tree at coinciding with colour breaking stage

4.

Source of Technology (ICAR/ AICRP/SAU/other, please specify)

NRC, Nagpur

5.

Production system and thematic area

Irrigated upland, IPM

6.

Performance of the Technology with performance indicators

% of fruit sucking moth infestation

FP-18

TO1-8

TO2-11

7.

Final recommendation for micro level situation

Removal ofalternate host& weed, installation of light trap, poison bait, foliar application of neem oil(1%) at 10 days interval at coinciding with colour breaking stage reduces fruit sucking moth

8.

Constraints identified and feedback for research

Effective light trap and pheromone trap for fruit sucking moth

9.

Process of farmers participation and their reaction

Group meeting, Personal contact, Diagnostic visit, Method demonstration

Technology option

No. of trials

Yield component

Disease/ insect pest incidence (%)

Yield

(q/ha)

Cost of cultivation

(Rs./ha)

Gross return (Rs/ha)

Net return

(Rs./ha)

BC ratio

No. of effective tillers/hill

No. of spikelet per panicle

Test wt. (100 grain wt.)

FP

11

18.0

122

165000

366000

201000

2.22

TO1

11

8.0

156

185000

468000

283000

2.53

TO2

11

11.0

145

190000

435000

245000

2.29

1.

Title of On farm Trial

Assessment of  different shapes of beds for cultivation of Paddy straw mushroom (Volvariella volvacea) using crumpled straw

2.

Problem diagnosed

Less production in paddy straw mushroom using crumpled straw due to  inappropriate shape

3.

Details of technologies selected for assessment/refinement

(Mention either Assessed or Refined)

Circular compact bed of size  (45 cm diameter, 30 cm height) of Paddy straw mushroom prepared from crumpled straw

4.

Source of Technology (ICAR/ AICRP/SAU/other, please specify)

Department of Plant Pathology, Tamil            Nadu Agricultural University, Coimbatore- 2012

5.

Production system and thematic area

Homebased,Mushroom production

6.

Performance of the Technology with performance indicators

Yield (Kg/ Bed) ,Biological efficiency (%),Net income

7.

Final recommendation for micro level situation

Average weight/button (g), Pin head appearance (days) Biological efficiency (%),

8.

Constraints identified and feedback for research

Maximum yield was observed in Square compact bed size (30 × 30 cm)

9.

Process of farmers participation and their reaction

Care is needed for watering and management of mushroom bed.

Technology option

No. of trials

Yield component

Yield (kg/bed)

Cost of cultivation (Rs./100beds)

Gross return (Rs/100beds)

Net return (Rs./ha)

BC ratio

Biological efficiency

FP

7

11.4

0.650

5200

13000

7800

1.90

TO1

7

9.5

0.445

5000

8800

3800

1.45

TO2

7

14.8

0.748

5560

14860

9200

2.84

1.

Title of On farm Trial

Assessment of  different value added products from tomato

2.

Problem diagnosed

Distress sale, spoilage due to high perishability without any value addition

3.

Details of technologies selected for assessment/refinement

(Mention either Assessed or Refined)

To1;Preparation of Tomato Puree

To2: Preparation of Tomato Sauce /ketch up

4.

Source of Technology (ICAR/ AICRP/SAU/other, please specify)

AICRP

5.

Production system and thematic area

Homestaed,Value addition

6.

Performance of the Technology with performance indicators

Yeild (kg/q) , BC Ratio

7.

Final recommendation for micro level situation

Production of finished product with proper packaging

8.

Constraints identified and feedback for research

Compition with market

9.

Process of farmers participation and their reaction

Value addition in tomato increases profit margin and  tomato ketch up had good market demand

Technology option

No. of trials

Yield (kg/quintal)

Selling price/q

Additional cost for value addition

Net return (Rs./ha)

BC ratio

FP

7

100

1000

0

300

1.4

TO1

7

40

7800

2200

4600

2.40

TO2

7

35

9860

2600

6200

2.72

1.

Title of On farm Trial

Assessment of high yielding medium duration rice varieties in kharif

2.

Problem diagnosed

Low yield in medium land due cultivation of old varieties

3.

Details of technologies selected for assessment/refinement

(Mention either Assessed or Refined)

TO₁ : Kalinga Dhan 1203 is medium duration (125 days), semi-dwarf (100cm) with medium slender and good grain quality rice variety.  It has average productivity of 55 q/ha.

TO₂: Kalinga Dhan 1204 is medium duration (125 days), semi-dwarf (95 cm) with medium slender and good grain quality rice variety.  It has average productivity of 55 q/ha.

TO₃: Kalinga Dhan 1205 is medium duration (125 days), semi-dwarf (95 cm) with medium slender and good grain quality rice variety.  It has average productivity of 55 q/ha.

4.

Source of Technology (ICAR/ AICRP/SAU/other, please specify)

Rice Research Station, Dept. Of Plant Breeding and Genetics, Bhubaneswar, 2022

5.

Production system and thematic area

Rice Production and crop production

6.

Performance of the Technology with performance indicators

Attached as TABLE- OFT-1

7.

Final recommendation for micro level situation

Kalinga Dhan 1205 Performed better than Kalinga Dhan 1203, 1204 and Practised variety (Lalat) with higher number of EBT and more profit.

8.

Constraints identified and feedback for research

The duration of the all the three variety was 5-8 days more than the expected. 

9.

Process of farmers participation and their reaction

Directly Cultivated by the farmers and given feedback after harvesting

Results

Duration (Days)

No. of EBT/m²

No of filled grains/panicle

Test weight (gm)

Yield (q/ha)

Profit

(Rs)

B:C

FP (Lalata)

126

231

97

20.1

36.3

26500

1.58

TO₁(Kalinga Dhan 1203)

128

268

106

19.8

42.7

40200

1.79

TO_{2 –} (Kalinga Dhan 1204)

136

281

113

20.3

43.5

43150

1.86

TO_{3 –} (Kalinga Dhan 1205)

136

284

116

20.1

43.8

44100

1.91

CD (0.05)

7.64

3.16

NS

0.36

816.5

0.09

1.

Title of On farm Trial

Assessment of non-ragi millet crops for diversification of millet production system

2.

Problem diagnosed

Less diversification of millet cultivation and marketing problem of finger millet

3.

Details of technologies selected for assessment/refinement

(Mention either Assessed or Refined)

TO₁: Little millet

TO₂: Pearl millet

TO₃: Foxtail millet

TO₄: Sorghum

4.

Source of Technology (ICAR/ AICRP/SAU/other, please specify)

SAU

5.

Production system and thematic area

Kharif, Rainfed, up land and medium land and Crop production

6.

Performance of the Technology with performance indicators

Attached

7.

Final recommendation for micro level situation

All the four introduced crops have well adopted by farmers and among those crops Sorghum performed better than the other crops in relation to FM EY and net profit.

8.

Constraints identified and feedback for research

High yielding variety availability

9.

Process of farmers participation and their reaction

Directly Cultivated by the farmers and given feedback after harvesting

Results

Plant

Height (cm)

Yield (q/ha)

Finger millet EY (q/ha)

Profit (Rs)

B:C

FP: Finger Millet (Var. Sreeratna)

94.3

11.6

11.6

21264

1.75

TO₁: Little Millet (Var. Kalinga Suan-18)

116.4

10.3

10.8

17850

1.63

TO₂: Pearl Millet

125.8

19.7

12.1

21712.5

1.72

TO₃: Fox tail Millet

82.6

9.8

10.3

19100

1.76

TO₄: Sorghum

197.5

16.8

13.2

24632.8

1.77

CD (0.05)

2.61

0.48

0.72

549.5

0.06

1.

Title of On farm Trial

Assessment  of different chilli varieties

2.

Problem diagnosed

Loss of  yield due to unavailability of suitable pest and disease resistant variety

3.

Details of technologies selected for assessment/refinement

(Mention either Assessed or Refined)

FP (Krishna)

TO₁(Arka Meghana)

TO_{2 –} (Arka Saanvi)

4.

Source of Technology (ICAR/ AICRP/SAU/other, please specify)

IIHR,Bengaluru,2011

5.

Production system and thematic area

Varietal evaluation, Kharif, Irrigated, Up land

6.

Performance of the Technology with performance indicators

Plant height (cm), No. of branches/plant, Fruit length(cm), Fruit girth(cm) No. of fruits/ plant,,Yield (q/ha), B:C ratio

7.

Final recommendation for micro level situation

Arka Meghana performed better than Arka Saanvi and practised variety (Krishna) with higher yield and more profit

8.

Constraints identified and feedback for research

 Arka Megahana have longer size than expected fruit size so less consumer preference .

9.

Process of farmers participation and their reaction

Filed visit, interaction, group discussion, problem identified and prioritization

Technology option

No. of trials

Yield component

Yield

(q/ha)

Cost of cultivation

(Rs./ha)

Gross return (Rs/ha)

Net return

(Rs./ha)

BC ratio

Plant height

Fruit length (cm)

No. of fruits / plant

FP (Krishna)

7

76.20

7.66

138.8

142.5

176500

413250

237249

2.34

TO₁(Arka Meghana)

7

73.15

11.31

151.4

164.8

176727

494400

317672

2.79

TO_{2 –} (Arka Saanvi)

7

70.32

8.02

142.7

151.7

176727

455100

278372

2.57

1.

Title of On farm Trial

Assessment of different management practices for YSB and leaf folder in Rice

2.

Problem diagnosed

Yield loss due to severe infestation of YSB and leaf folder in rice

3.

Details of technologies selected for assessment/refinement

(Mention either Assessed or Refined)

TO 1:Foliar spray of flubendiamide20%WG@125 g/ha at vegetative phase and at flowering stage

TO 2:Foliar spray withTetraniliprore20SC@250ml/ha at 25,45,and 65 DAT

To 3:Soil application twice of Cartap hydrochlorde7.5%+Emamectin benzoate 0.25%G@7.5 Kg/ha at 30 DAT and PI stage

4.

Source of Technology (ICAR/ AICRP/SAU/other, please specify)

OUAT2023,AICRP 2023

5.

Production system and thematic area

Rice –Rice,IPM

6.

Performance of the Technology with performance indicators

Deadheart reduced to1.2%,weh to0.8%,leaf folder2.6%

7.

Final recommendation for micro level situation

Soilapplication ofCartap hydrochloride7.5%+emamectin benzoate 0.25%at30DAT and PI stage is effective aganst stem borer and leaf folder

8.

Constraints identified and feedback for research

9.

Process of farmers participation and their reaction

Group meeting, PRA, Diagnostic visit, Training

Technology option

No. of trials

Yield component

Disease/ insect pest incidence (%)

Yield

(q/ha)

Cost of cultivation

(Rs./ha)

Gross return (Rs/ha)

Net return

(Rs./ha)

BC ratio

No. of effective tillers/hill

No. of spikelet per panicle

Test wt. (100 grain wt.)

FP

07

8.2

4.7

38.4

46484

88320

41836

1.93

TO 1

07

2.8

0.9

47.6

49513

109480

59967

2.2

TO 2

07

3.2

1.3

43.3

47423

99590

52167

2.1

TO 3

07

1.2

0.8

49.7

49700

114310

64610

2.3